Difference between revisions of "Mundane Studies"

From Cyborg Anthropology
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<blockquote>"In 2000, sociologist Wayne Brekhus published "A Mundane Manifesto," in which he "call(ed) for analytically interesting studies of the socially uninteresting." Brekhus continues, "I argue that the extraordinary draws disproportionate theoretical attention from researchers. This ultimately hinders theory development and distorts our picture of social reality. This manifesto paves the way for an explicit social science of the unmarked (mundane). It is hoped that a similar manifesto can be written for the humanities." Finally, he suggests, "Although there are many deviance journals to explicitly analyze socially unusual behavior there is no Journal of Mundane Behavior to explicitly analyze conformity."</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>"In 2000, sociologist Wayne Brekhus published "A Mundane Manifesto," in which he "call(ed) for analytically interesting studies of the socially uninteresting." Brekhus continues, "I argue that the extraordinary draws disproportionate theoretical attention from researchers. This ultimately hinders theory development and distorts our picture of social reality. This manifesto paves the way for an explicit social science of the unmarked (mundane). It is hoped that a similar manifesto can be written for the humanities." Finally, he suggests, "Although there are many deviance journals to explicitly analyze socially unusual behavior there is no Journal of Mundane Behavior to explicitly analyze conformity."</blockquote>
  
<blockquote>"Thus, well before Ryman does so, Brekhus argues that the focus on the "extraordinary" shifts our focus away from the "ordinary" and, ultimately, blinds us to the immediacy of the here and now. Instead, he calls for an explicit turn to the immediate and the mundane" <ref>[http://www.sfra.org/sfra-review/289.pdf “Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16. ]</ref>.</blockquote>
+
<blockquote>"Thus, well before Ryman does so, Brekhus argues that the focus on the "extraordinary" shifts our focus away from the "ordinary" and, ultimately, blinds us to the immediacy of the here and now. Instead, he calls for an explicit turn to the immediate and the mundane" <ref>[http://www.sfra.org/sfra-review/289.pdf “Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16.]</ref>.</blockquote>
  
 
===External Links===
 
===External Links===
Line 14: Line 14:
 
*[http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/12/news/cl-56209 An Online Journal With Nothing Exciting to Report] by Scott Martelle. L.A. Times, October 12, 2001.  
 
*[http://articles.latimes.com/2001/oct/12/news/cl-56209 An Online Journal With Nothing Exciting to Report] by Scott Martelle. L.A. Times, October 12, 2001.  
 
*[https://dspace.gla.ac.uk/bitstream/1905/86/1/elaurier002.pdf The Cappuccino Community : cafés and civic life in the contemporary city] by Eric Laurier & Chris Philo Department of Geography & Topographic Science, University of Glasgow G12 8QQ Scotland
 
*[https://dspace.gla.ac.uk/bitstream/1905/86/1/elaurier002.pdf The Cappuccino Community : cafés and civic life in the contemporary city] by Eric Laurier & Chris Philo Department of Geography & Topographic Science, University of Glasgow G12 8QQ Scotland
 +
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20070929124839/http://www.mundanebehavior.org/ Journal of Mundane Behavior on Archive.org]
  
 
===Related Reading===
 
===Related Reading===

Revision as of 00:16, 14 February 2011

Definition

The study of the events and systems that comprise the experiences of everyday life.

Purpose

Studying everyday life is important in a changing culture, especially one that is defined and recreated constantly by technology. As a participant in a rapidly changing culture, one becomes used to change. It is only by studying the everyday that one can understand how much things have changed from one year to the next. In addition, the mundanities of one culture can be extremely different from another culture. One can thus study the differences between one culture, demographic or totem group simply by charting out and comparing their everyday lives.

History

"In 2000, sociologist Wayne Brekhus published "A Mundane Manifesto," in which he "call(ed) for analytically interesting studies of the socially uninteresting." Brekhus continues, "I argue that the extraordinary draws disproportionate theoretical attention from researchers. This ultimately hinders theory development and distorts our picture of social reality. This manifesto paves the way for an explicit social science of the unmarked (mundane). It is hoped that a similar manifesto can be written for the humanities." Finally, he suggests, "Although there are many deviance journals to explicitly analyze socially unusual behavior there is no Journal of Mundane Behavior to explicitly analyze conformity."
"Thus, well before Ryman does so, Brekhus argues that the focus on the "extraordinary" shifts our focus away from the "ordinary" and, ultimately, blinds us to the immediacy of the here and now. Instead, he calls for an explicit turn to the immediate and the mundane" [1].

External Links

Related Reading

References

  1. “Mundane SF 101,” SFRA Review 289 (Summer 2009): 13–16.